As a solution to its aging population and stretched pension system, Germany’s coalition government has tabled a bill that will allow as young as six-year-olds to start retirement savings in state-backed accounts. The “early start pension” proposal, led by Chancellor Friedrich Merz, will try to secure long-term prosperity for future generations while easing system pressures of population loss. If put into place, the plan would be one of the most radical experiments in retirement policy in recent history.
Mechanics of the early start pension plan
All German children aged 6 to 18 would receive €10 a month (approximately $10.80) automatically from the federal government, paid into a tax-preferred retirement account in the new system. The contributions would total €1,440 per child after 12 years, before investment returns. The money would be invested in the capital markets in low-cost index funds and the earnings compounded tax-free until at the statutory retirement age—currently 67 but bound to rise with Germany’s demographic profile.
One of the prime features is the lifetime horizon of investment: a six-year-old saving from 2025 would have 61 years of market exposure before breaking into the cash. With the modest 5% annual return, rough estimates place the accounts at over €50,000 per child on non-contributary terms. To place this in context, Germany’s typical monthly public pension payment in 2025 will be €1,550, so that the mooted accounts amount to a top-up and not a primary source of income.
Demographic pressures necessitating innovation
Germany’s pension system is suffering from a crisis of dependency ratio. With 22% of the population aged 67 and older, and fertility rates saturating at 1.5 children per woman, in 2040, there will be only 1.5 workers per retiree, compared to 2.8 in 2020. The public pension scheme contributing 25% of federal outlay requires immediate reforms to remain buoyant.
The children’s pension scheme supplements other provisions such as the Riester-Rente, a subsidized private pension scheme for which parents get paid €300 each year for each child born after 2008. Even so, the new scheme critically varies because it transfers the burden away from parental contribution and toward government-funded capital formation. In reaction, Social Minister Hubertus Heil said, “This is intergenerational justice in action—using time as an asset even modest contributions can grow into meaningful security”.
Integration with existing financial systems
The scheme’s designers are confronted with significant integration issues with the German welfare system. The existing law discriminates against students with assets above €15,000 by precluding them from means-tested grants of up to €10,000 per year. In order not to produce undesirable side effects, the envisaged retirement savings accounts would be exempted from assets tests for student benefit—a design aspect of key significance to prevent detriment to low-income families.
Tax implications make things more complex to implement. Germany allows tax-free €400,000 donations to children once a decade, but contributions to retirement accounts would require exemptions to avoid reducing this amount. The bill also suggests enabling families to voluntarily contribute to children’s pensions, although specifics are unclear.
Criticisms and counterarguments
Economists also cast doubt on the proposal’s efficiency at the cost. When finished, the scheme would cost €1.2 billion a year to provide for 1 million six-year-olds—a total that would double to €2.4 billion if extended to all 6–18-year-olds. Opponents suggest the money would be better used closing the public pension scheme’s estimated 2040 20% shortfall.
Others speak of possible intergenerational distortions. “This plan actually takes current taxpayers to subsidize future retirees’ retirement investments in the stock market,” Berlin Free University economist Clara Wagner said. “If returns on the market are modest, we are destined to have a new generation of pensioners reliant on state toppings either way.”
Comparative international context
Germany’s plan draws inspiration from the U.S. 401Kids Savings Act, which would introduce federally matched children’s savings plans. The German system, though, marries universal state contribution with ultra-early enrollment in a unique way. Unlike Singapore’s Baby Bonus cash grants or Canada’s Registered Education Savings Plan, its exclusive emphasis on retirement and not education or housing establishes a new benchmark for child-focused financial policy.
Read more: Trump’s ‘big beautiful bill’ sparks SNAP warning in key Midwest state
Read more: What is the difference between Veteran’s Day and Memorial Day and when is each celebrated in the United States?
