The Retirement Rule of $1,000, or “$1,000-a-month rule,” refers to a budget-style retirement saving guideline for estimating how much one needs for a certain monthly income during retirement. Certified financial planner Wes Moss created this rule to state that for every $1,000 of desired monthly income in retirement, one needs about $240,000 in savings.
This is simple math: withdrawing 5% annually from $240,000 makes $12,000 per year, or $1,000 per month. This is assuming a 5% withdrawal rate and a 5% return on the investments.
How to apply the rule
If one wishes to effectively make use of the rule, below is a step-by-step process:
- Calculate monthly needs: Estimate how much you will need monthly in retirement, including housing, food, transportation, healthcare, insurance, and entertainment. If unsure, take your current expenses and add a conservative margin.
- Formula application: Multiply desired monthly income by $240,000. For example, if your monthly requirement is $3,000, then $720,000 would be needed in o retirement savings ($3,000 x $240,000 = $720,000).
- Consider other income sources: Remember that this rule applies only to income coming from private savings. Include Social Security benefits, pensions, rental income, or part-time work earnings in the equation; they will lower your required savings target significantly.
Take Jane, who estimates she requires $4,000 a month during retirement. Using the $1,000 rule: $4,000 × $240,000 = required savings of $960,000. However, if Jane expects $2,000 monthly from Social Security, she only needs savings to generate $2,000 monthly, reducing her target to $480,000.
The rule offers quick reference for common scenarios:
- $2,000/month = $480,000 in savings needed
- $3,000/month = $720,000 in savings needed
- $5,000/month = $1.2 million in savings needed
Severe limitations and criticism
- Attacking withdrawal rates: Most financial reporters consider the 5 percent withdrawal rate upon which this rule sounds aggressive. While some have more historically reliable income streams over a 30-year retirement in the traditional 4-percent rule, others have suggested that such an approach might be very risky. Some even recommend going as low as 3 percent withdrawal rates in particular situations.
- Inflation blind: The rule neglects the reality of inflation and purchasing power over time. What might cost $1,000 today will demand much more coins in the future, leaving perhaps insufficient income for retirees later on.
- Market volatility would be an omission: It assumes a steady investment return of 5 percent, which does not take into account reality when excellent portfolios have considerable ups and downs. In a down market, one could easily speed up portfolio depletion by maintaining the 5 percent withdrawal rate.
- Planning longevity in limited context: A $240,000 portfolio would easily deplete in just 20 years with 5 percent annual withdrawals if letters dropped below expectations. Most retirees now are looking at retirement periods extending beyond 30 years.
Other approaches and improvements alternative
- The 4 percent rule: In the first year of retirement, this more conservative strategy recommends withdrawing 4 percent and adjusting that amount in the years after for inflation. Research shows that this has succeeded in 90 percent of historical 30-year retirement periods with balanced portfolios.
- Flexible withdrawal strategy: These experts suggest that withdrawals should be based on the performance of the markets instead of a set percentage, with amounts closer to 5% during good markets but reducing to 4% in murky times.
- Bucket strategy: This might help one to take higher withdrawal rates with lower risks while managing the risks by dividing retirement assets into three categories: cash for immediate needs, income-generating investments for medium-term stability, and growth investments for long-term appreciation.
When the rule may be useful
Nonetheless, the $1,000 rule can clearly serve as a heuristic, and, in an imperfect world, should not be stripped of its relevant and very valuable functions as a point of departure for discussion about retirement planning. One can mention such important ones as:
- Simplifying complex calculations for those intimidated by detailed financial planning
- Setting initial savings targets that can later be refined with professional guidance
- Motivation for increasing savings through clarity in linking monthly income goals to specific dollar amounts
- Rough estimates for early retirement planning
The rule works best when combined with comprehensive planning that covers healthcare costs, inflation, market volatility, and personal circumstance. Rather than rely alone on this guideline, retirees should consider it as one tool among a larger retirement strategy that includes professional financial counseling and periodic adjustment of the plan.
The Retirement Rule of $1,000 is the most simple and feasible way to enter the whole realm of retirement planning, but by no means it is the endpoint. It can be quite memorable in its linking of savings and income goals, but the aggressive presumptions regarding withdrawal rates and the returns on investments do not correspond to those of a secure, long-term retirement. Use it for initial discussion, not final result-orientation. Also firm it up with some more comprehensive planning that acknowledges inflation, market volatility, healthcare costs, and your unique financial situation.
Read more: How much will it cost to watch UFC on Paramount: fight fans celebrate end to pay-per-view
