President Trump’s recent policy memo, signed on April 15, 2025, has caused widespread controversy over the future of Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Though the administration frames the reforms as an effort to attack fraud and streamline entitlement programs, critics assert that the actions could disproportionately affect vulnerable communities, including illegal immigrants, low-income families, and seniors. Below, we dissect the specific groups impacted by the new rules and the broader implications of Trump’s latest action.
Undocumented immigrants: Excluded from benefit eligibility
One of the most straightforward effects of Trump’s memorandum is the express exclusion of illegal immigrants from the receipt of Social Security benefits. The policy mandates that the Social Security Administration (SSA) collaborate with immigration enforcement agencies to verify legal status before processing claims. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt clarified that “taxpayer-funded benefits should be reserved for eligible taxpayers,” citing concerns over fraudulent claims by individuals who do not have legal residency.
This change is one part of Trump’s broader immigration plan, which has focused on making federal programs more stringent in screening eligibility. Despite the administration estimating the figure as “millions of undocumented people” who have gained benefits illegally, immigrant advocate groups warn that mixed-status households—U.S. citizens and their unauthorized relatives—could lose valuable financial aid. For example, U.S.-born children of unauthorized immigrants could see delayed or denied Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits if family household eligibility is recertified.
Older beneficiaries: Greater caution against identity theft
The memo also targets potential identity theft on the part of elderly beneficiaries, particularly those with ages listed as more than 100 years old in Social Security records. The SSA Office of the Inspector General is now required to review earnings reports for centenarians that have discrepancies in their records. While the administration claims this measure corrects “unrealistic beneficiary ages,” critics argue that clerical errors—such as outdated death records or entry errors—could incorrectly flag legitimate recipients.
For example, caregivers who have taken care of elderly relatives without necessarily reporting deaths can inadvertently trigger fraud investigations. The SSA’s Acting Commissioner, Lee Dudek, acknowledged that some of the records contain outdated information but asserted the audits are necessary to “protect the integrity of the system”. But seniors’ activists argue the policy will lead to delay in benefit payments for vulnerable populations relying on timely payments for healthcare and housing.
Low-income families: Medicaid cuts amid budget constraints
While Trump has promised multiple times to safeguard Medicaid, his support for the House Republicans’ 2025 budget plan creates doubts about long-term financing. The bill proposes a $880 billion reduction over the decade in the budget category for Medicaid and Medicare. While the administration says these savings will hit “waste and fraud,” healthcare experts caution that state Medicaid programs, serving 70 million low-income Americans, may see their federal matching funds cut.
States with higher Medicaid enrollment rates, such as California and Texas, may be forced to reduce eligibility criteria or discontinue services, disproportionately affecting children, pregnant women, and nursing home residents. For instance, nearly 40% of U.S. children and 60% of nursing home residents rely on Medicaid for medical coverage, and they are thus most vulnerable to funding shortfalls.
Taxpayers and workers: Payroll tax cuts and long-term solvency threats
Trump’s promise to eliminate federal taxes on Social Security benefits received by retirees—and potentially lower payroll taxes—has been greeted with a mixed reaction. While beneficiaries may appreciate modest boosts in take-home pay, economists caution that reducing the program’s primary source of funding (payroll taxes) could accelerate the anticipated insolvency of Social Security’s trust fund, currently expected to occur by 2035.
Workers earning less than $160,000 annually contribute 6.2% of their income to Social Security, with employers contributing an equal amount. Reducing these rates would reduce the program’s ability to support current benefit levels, particularly as the U.S. population ages. Additionally, the administration’s focus on privatizing Medicare through increased Medicare Advantage plans—22% more costly per beneficiary than traditional Medicare—could further strain federal healthcare budgets.
Balancing fraud prevention and benefit accessibility
The Trump administration’s reforms reflect a dual emphasis on reducing improper payments and entitlement program reform. While programs like fraud prosecution units and eligibility audits aim to save taxpayers money, the collateral impact on vulnerable populations emphasizes the subtlety of social safety net transformation. As entitlement spending politics intensify, the challenge is distinguishing between real cost-saving efforts and policies that might further exacerbate inequality. As the midterm elections approach, the fate of Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid is inevitably tied to politics and economics in general.
Read more: Why are my Supplemental Security Income (SSI) payments under review?
Read more: Bad news for Social Security checks – Here are new rules that will put obstacles in the way of collecting SSI and SSDI payments…
