Did the US strikes on Iran destroy the nuclear sites? What American intelligence says

Early U.S. intelligence says Iran’s nuclear program survived the strikes—despite Trump’s claims of total destruction.

Modified on:
June 25, 2025 7:29 am

Hi, so let’s talk about what happened with the recent US military strikes on Iran’s nuclear sites. All this hullabaloo, especially from senior US officials, but when you listen to American intelligence, the facts are not so cut and dry.

What the attacks were supposed to achieve

Over the weekend, the US bombed Iran’s three nuclear sites with extreme violence. President Trump and his government called the operation a monumental success. Trump went so far as to state the airstrikes “completely and totally obliterated” Iran’s nuclear program.

But today, preliminary indications from US intelligence say an entirely different story.

What US intelligence found

According to seven sources that are familiar with a classified report, the punch may not be so huge as everyone was led to think. This was issued by the Defense Intelligence Agency (or DIA), the Pentagon agency responsible for analyzing global threats.

This is what they found:

  •  Iran’s nuclear program is still intact.
  •  The sensitive content of the program, such as the equipment to make enriched uranium (centrifuges), is largely still intact.
  •  Iran’s stockpile of uranium material that can be used to build nuclear weapons was not destroyed.
  •  The enriched uranium could have been smuggled out of the buildings to be used before the attacks.

A top official estimated the attack had delayed Iran’s nuclear program by only a few months.

What the white house says

The White House is not fond of the report. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt labeled it “flat-out wrong” and accused someone of leaking it, as they wanted to portray Trump negatively. She is defending the strikes and said pilots conducted a perfect mission.

Trump also reacted online. On Twitter, he referred to the attacks as “one of the most successful military strikes in history” and wrote that “nuclear facilities are now destroyed.”

So, who’s right?

It’s still too early to say for sure right now. US military officials report the mission was progressing on schedule. But intelligence analysts continue to get more intelligence coming from inside Iran.

Also keep in mind that the Defense Intelligence Agency report probably does not represent other intelligence agencies’ opinions. Those other estimates have yet to emerge.

So while the strike was massive and showy-looking, it’s not clear it ended Iran’s nuclear program. It might have caused some damage and added some delays—but not complete destruction.

Final thought

Sometimes what is reported in the media a while after an attack isn’t the whole story. Intelligence takes time. And now the experts closest to the facts are saying: Iran’s nuclear program is healthy and thriving — temporarily sidetracked.

Read this much later

Trump tells Congress to get the One, Big, Beautiful Bill passed: “NO ONE GOES ON VACATION UNTIL IT’S DONE”

Could Canada be the 51st state in the United States? Donald Trump’s claim over America’s northern neighbour

How many presidential pardons have there been in all of history, which presidents have granted them and for what reasons?

DS-261 Form: what is it, instructions, how to fill it out, when to use and how long does it take to get a Green…

What does the Iran-Israel ceasefire mean for gas prices?

Why does Trump think tariffs are good for America? Here’s what experts have to say about the new president’s tariff moves

Lawrence Udia
Lawrence Udiahttps://polifinus.com/author/lawrence-u/
I am a journalist specializing in delivering the latest news on politics, IRS updates, retail trends, SNAP payments, and Social Security. My role involves monitoring developments in these areas, analyzing their impact on everyday Americans, and ensuring readers are informed about significant changes that could affect their lives.

Must read

Related News