The newly signed ceasefire agreement between the Houthi rebels of Yemen and the Trump administration, brokered by Oman, is a sea change in regional security trends. Following seven weeks of intensified U.S. airstrikes aimed at disrupting Houthi military capabilities and more than 100 Houthi attacks on commercial shipping since November 2023, both sides have agreed to cease conflict in the Red Sea and Bab al-Mandab Strait. Although the accord guarantees freedom of navigation for foreign ships, the Houthis are adamant that their campaign against Israeli-associated vessels will continue until Israel’s Gaza blockade is lifted. The step has significant implications for international shipping, regional economies, and global geopolitical stability.
The ceasefire agreement: Key terms and immediate impacts
Under the Oman-mediated deal, the U.S. will stop air bombing of the Houthi militia in Yemen, and the Houthis will halt missile and drone strikes against commercial ships in the Red Sea. Strikingly, Israeli ships fall outside the ceasefire terms of the agreement because they are still considered valid targets for the Houthis as a result of the war in Gaza. This captures the ideological orientation of the group towards Iran and Palestine solidarity rather than more existential maritime security.
For the shipping community, the short-term gain is the potential resumption of safe passage through the Red Sea, a 12% of global trade route. Houthi attacks since November 2023 had forced leading carriers like Maersk and CMA CGM to reroute ships by going around Africa’s Cape of Good Hope, spending 10–14 days extra on Asian-European routes and costing an additional $1 million in fuel costs per trip. Insurance premiums for Red Sea transits had also risen to 1% of vessel value, from 0.05% before the war. After the cease-fire, analysts predict a 30–40% decline in war risk premiums by Q3 2025, welcoming risk-averse operators back to Suez Canal routes.
Shipping industry response: Cautious optimism amid lingering risks
In spite of the diplomatic overture, shipping giants are cautious. Maersk and Hapag-Lloyd said they would keep ships going around the Cape of Good Hope at least until June 2025, citing lingering security issues and requiring “tangible, sustained proof” of compliance by the Houthi side. This is due to the history of the Houthis’ disruptive ceasefires as well as from the group’s vague statement that its “initial understanding” with the U.S. does not influence its alignment towards Israel.
The insurance market has responded sensibly. Howden’s recently launched Red Sea war risk product, at $50 million per vessel coverage, is in line with the market’s anticipation of slow normalisation. Nevertheless, underwriters like Markel and Navium have maintained exclusions for attacks on Israeli-related vessels, to keep policies commensurate with the scope of the ceasefire. For non-Israeli traffic, this specialisation can lower premiums by 15–20% by Q4 2025, provided that there are no major breaches.
Economic impacts: Suez Canal receipts and global trade
Egypt has a lot to gain from revived Red Sea trade. The Suez Canal Authority registered a 50% drop in monthly receipts-from $750 million to $375 million-during the height of the crisis, adding to the foreign currency deficit within the country. Complete revival of pre-crisis transit levels has the ability to inject $4.5 billion into the Egyptian economy every year, stabilizing the Egyptian pound and inflationary pressure.
Worldwide, going back to Suez routes would save about $3 billion a month in aggregate shipping expenses, with consumer goods and energy markets being the prime beneficiaries. Already, though, re-directed Cape of Good Hope traffic has spurred investment in African port infrastructure, presaging long-term realignments of trade flows even if the cease fire is maintained.
Regional geopolitical implications: Oman’s mediation and future challenges
Oman’s effective brokering boosts its image as a impartial go-between in Gulf diplomacy, capitalizing on its mediation of the 2015 Iran nuclear talks. By having the U.S. and the Houthis emerge victoriously, Muscat would prefer to establish itself as essential for future talks, especially for U.S.-Iran relations. That weakness of the deal is clear. The Houthis also possess Iranian-supplied sophisticated missiles that are able to reach ships 1,500 km away, and sustained Israel attacks by the Houthis risk drawing the U.S. into conflict once again.
Additionally, the ceasefire fails to cover Yemen’s internal war, which sees 70% of the country under control by Houthi forces. Sustainable maritime security actually depends on a finalized Yemeni peace process, which is still stagnant.
Read more: Who is Ryan Wesley Routh, the alleged second shooter who tried to assassinate Trump at a Florida golf course
Read more: What is a DDOS attack and what we know about the cyberattack on X in Musk’s interview with Trump?
