The U.S. Senate moved closer to passing federal regulation of stablecoins under the GENIUS Act (Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins of 2025), a bipartisan measure, which secured a key procedural vote on May 19, 2025. This landmark bill, which is more likely to pass now having gained the support of 16 Democrats, aims to implement the first comprehensive regulatory structure for stablecoins-an estimated $250 billion segment in the world of cryptocurrency. The following are the bill’s provisions, political motivations, and implications for consumers and financial markets.
Key provisions: Federal regulator for stablecoin issuers
The GENIUS Act proposes a tiered regulatory regime for stablecoin issuers, where institutions are differentiated on the basis of their market presence. Issuers whose stablecoins are in circulation worth more than $10 billion will have to adhere to federal standards under the Federal Reserve’s regulations for banks or the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) for nonbanks. Lower-tier issuers can remain under state-based regulations, subject to achieving minimum federal standards.
Most importantly, the bill requires that all stablecoins have a 1:1 reserve requirement over “high-quality liquid assets” like U.S. Treasuries or near-equivalents. Foreign stablecoins like Tether (USDT) will need to seek the approval of U.S. regulators and be subject to anti-money laundering (AML) rules to sell in the U.S. market. These provisions are designed to reduce bank run risk and dirty money risk and offer regulatory certainty to blockchain innovators.
Bipartisan negotiations: Amendments secure Democratic votes
Initially derailed in early May 2025 by Democratic party leaders due to concerns over inadequate consumer protections and associations with Trump-affiliated crypto projects, the GENIUS Act gained momentum after the amendments. Negotiators included more stringent AML requirements, such as real-time monitoring of transactions, and enhanced consumer protections like mandatory redemption right disclosures and reserve audits.
One such provision was ethics guidelines that would bar public figures like Elon Musk and David Sacks from engaging in stablecoin projects while serving on government advisory committees. The provision was intended to placate Democratic fears of conflict of interest; however, critics say it does nothing to stem President Trump’s entanglement with World Liberty Financial, a firm linked to his family’s USD1 stablecoin.
Democratic support: A delicate balance between innovation and accountability
Sixteen Democrats joined Republicans to advance the bill, a dramatic shift from earlier opposition. Senators like Mark Warner (D-VA) emphasized the need to keep stablecoin creation from flowing offshore, stating, “Blockchain technology is here to stay”. Others like Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) framed the bill as a middle ground that “protects consumers while enabling responsible innovations”.
But support is still contingent. A number of Democrats, such as Banking Committee Ranking Member Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), maintain the bill is still insufficient in protections. Warren cautioned that it would “turbocharge” the stablecoin market to $2 trillion without addressing danger in the form of algorithmic stablecoin failure or foreign manipulation. And yet, supporters chose to define a line in the sand on regulation rather than prolong legislative stagnation.
Criticisms and unresolved conflicts
Progressives and libertarians have both condemned the GENIUS Act. Senator Elizabeth Warren condemned it for not being able to even prohibit the largest tech giants from the issuance of stablecoins, a Republican requirement even Josh Hawley (R-MO) wagered. Privacy activists are in opposition to surveillance requirements in transactions. “They undermine the decentralization culture of cryptocurrency.”
President Trump’s cryptocurrency transactions remain a controversial topic. New accusations of Abu Dhabi investors pouring $148 million into Trump-linked businesses, including World Liberty Financial, raised more eyebrows. Even though the ethics amendment resolves some of the conflicts, it does not necessarily prohibit presidential financial dealings, and there is hence an open door critics call “dangerously vague.”
Implications: A foundation for future crypto regulation
The GENIUS Act would be, upon enactment, the most significant federal crypto bill to date. It would promote stablecoin adoption for payments, remittances, and decentralized finance, as major financial players such as PayPal and Visa have already signaled their plans to issue stablecoins under the new regime.
The bill also sets a precedent for broader crypto market regulation. House committees are concurrently drafting legislation to clarify oversight of digital asset exchanges and token classifications, potentially mirroring the GENIUS Act’s bipartisan approach. Nevertheless, debates over central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and energy-intensive proof-of-work cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin remain unresolved.
Read more: What is ‘hybrid warfare’, the concept suggested by Germany and Finland after the cutting of two submarine cables in the Baltic
Read more: The change with the California FEHA Act that benefits millions of people – They will no longer need this document to get a job…
