In a shocking twist of fate following the complaint by Trump and a rage of stock losses running into hundreds of millions, Cracker Barrel has reversed the controversial decision on its newly brought logo and its rebranding to the traditional old “Old Timer” design after less than a week of sustained and heavy criticism by the sorority of conservative voices, including President Donald Trump. It was a PR nightmare that quickly opened a window to about $100 million off.
The logo change that sparked controversy
Cracker Barrel unveiled its fifth logo iteration on August 19, 2025, as part of an “All the More” branding initiative also detailed here, This is Cracker Barrel’s new logo, which has upset many in the United States – The company has suffered millions in losses on the…. The new minimalist version kept the company’s signature color theme of gold and brown but left out Uncle Herschel’s figure — an elderly man in overalls who had been depicted leaning against a wooden barrel at the restaurant since 1977.
This logo simplification would feature only the names of the restaurant along with a yellow barrel-shaped silhouette, the figure of Uncle Hershel, and the actual barrel that had defined the company for decades. This change resulted from a modernizing initiative that included CEO Julie Felss Masino, who had hitherto described the 55-year-old chain as ”not as relevant as we once were”.
Immediate and abrupt market punishment
From the start, Cracker Barrel utterly failed to make a pretense of caring about it. Stock price quickly fell further than 15% in a day: from $59.02 down to a low of $50.27 before partial recovery to $54.80. Thus was wiped out by this first day approximately $94 million of market value, with later losses exceeding $143 million as the storm grew.
Dramatic trading volume, nearly four million shares changed hands during the worst day – four times more than its ordinary daily average. Within a few trading sessions, losses had wiped out most year-to-date gains.
Backlash from conservatives and political pressure
It quickly became the locus for America’s current culture wars, with conservative commentators and social-media types shouting about Cracker Barrel “going woke” with the change. Donald Trump Jr. was one of the loudest voices in potty contention of the change, posting on X: “WTF is wrong with @CrackerBarrel??!”.
President Trump reached the greatest intensity when he spoke up on August 26 and posted on Truth Social: “Cracker Barrel should go back to the old logo, admit a mistake based on customer response (the ultimate Poll), and manage their company better than ever before”. Trump apparently characterized it as possibly what could be worth “a Billion Dollars worth of free publicity if they play their cards right….”
Corporate capitulation and reversal
Within hours of Trump’s social media intervention, Cracker Barrel announced its complete surrender to the backlash, issuing a statement on Tuesday evening, August 26: “We thank our guests for sharing your voices and love for Cracker Barrel. We said we would listen, and we have. Our new logo is going away and our ‘Old Timer’ will remain”.
White House deputy chief of staff Taylor Budowich revealed that Cracker Barrel executives had personally contacted the administration to express gratitude for Trump’s involvement. “They thanked President Trump for weighing in on the issue of their iconic ‘original’ logo,” Budowich stated on X.
Trump’s cheer and market reaction
Trump then posted an encouraging remark in wake of the company’s capitulation: “All your fans are very grateful.” He told the company to “Make lots of money and, above all, make your customers happy again!” and even presented the White House with a modified image of the original Cracker Barrel logo featuring Trump’s likeness, with the caption “Go woke, Go broke.”
Market reaction was favorable and Cracker Barrel stocks surged more than 7% on after-hours trading following the announcement. On the next day, shares climbed as high as 8% in early Wednesday trading.
Brand expert reviews: A marketing disaster
Marketing professionals minced no words in referring to Cracker Barrel’s handling of the incident. That Indian said to CBS: from a branding perspective, it’s basically a flop. He told that they had abandoned “their brand story, which was the old logo, that reflected the southern, whimsical atmosphere in the stores”.
In particular, the removal of Uncle Herschel along with the namesake barrel fired up loyalists who saw the original imagery as representing “a throwback to a simpler time that was about home cooking”. Franchise consultant Nick Yeonakis pointed out that customers had gotten into the frame of mind of “constant and stable”, making such a rebranding jarring.
The bigger picture: Corporate culture wars
From earlier, this issue indicated that it was an even finer-minitude of the treacherous paths by which majority companies must cross in these divided times in America. The unfortunate incident may be likened to other recent misfires corporately, like Bud Light’s partnership with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney and boycotts that followed, as well as the significant financial losses.
Citi analyst Jon Tower said that, while the controversy garnered huge attention- even “Cracker Barrel” created Google searches at an all-time high for the name- the long-term business impact is still unclear. “More attention doesn’t necessarily translate into consistent patronage,” he noted, although it might bring in short-term curiosity visits.
Read more: Beloved chicken chain makes bold play for New York with 20 new franchises
